State ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse

451 N.E.2d 248, 6 Ohio St. 3d 55, 6 Ohio B. 73, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 777
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 20, 1983
DocketNo. 82-981
StatusPublished
Cited by43 cases

This text of 451 N.E.2d 248 (State ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse, 451 N.E.2d 248, 6 Ohio St. 3d 55, 6 Ohio B. 73, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 777 (Ohio 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant contests the denial of his request for an award of attorney fees.

“The general rule in Ohio is that, absent a statutory provision allowing attorney fees as costs, the prevailing party is not entitled to an award of at[56]*56torney fees unless the party against whom the fees are taxed was found to have acted in bad faith. See Sorin v. Bd. of Edn. (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 177 [75 O.O.2d 224]; State, ex rel. Grosser, v. Boy (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 184 [75 O.O.2d 228].” State, ex rel. Crockett, v. Robinson (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 363, 369 [21 O.O.2d 228],

Appellant argues that appellees acted in bad faith by engaging in dilatory conduct designed to prolong litigation and delay the award of back pay to appellant. Specifically, appellant contends that appellees’ motion to dismiss, the granting of which was the subject of the first appeal to this court, was without merit and filed only for the purpose of delay.

We cannot agree that this demonstrates bad faith on the part of appellees. As we stated in State, ex rel. Crockett, supra, at 369-370, the fact that appellees interposed a defense which was ultimately overruled does not, in and of itself, demonstrate bad faith. The court of appeals was persuaded by the motion and granted it. Though we reversed the dismissal, we agree that a colorable issue was presented for consideration on the merits as to whether appellant’s intervening retirement would affect his entitlement to back pay.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant an award of attorney fees.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Fire Fighters, Local 93 of the I.A.F.F. v. Cleveland
2020 Ohio 4751 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & Gambel
2019 Ohio 3756 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
Becker v. Direct Energy, LP
2018 Ohio 4134 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
Painter v. Testa
2017 Ohio 267 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
Whitt Sturtevant, L.L.P. v. NC Plaza L.L.C.
2015 Ohio 3976 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)
State ex rel. Cornell v. Greene Cty. Bd. Commrs.
2014 Ohio 5584 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Watershed Mgt., L.L.C. v. Neff
2012 Ohio 1020 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
Grieselding v. Krischak, L-06-1010 (6-1-2007)
2007 Ohio 2668 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Ohio Civil Rights v. Burch, Unpublished Decision (1-26-2005)
2005 Ohio 259 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Fowler v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (11-24-2003)
2003 Ohio 6257 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 N.E.2d 248, 6 Ohio St. 3d 55, 6 Ohio B. 73, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kabatek-v-stackhouse-ohio-1983.