State Ex Rel. Investors Syndicate v. Graham

1936 OK 756, 62 P.2d 986, 178 Okla. 259, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 562
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 1, 1936·No. No. 27064.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court was entered on the 2nd day of October, 1934, and a motion for new trial was filed on the 4th day of October, 1934, and the order overruling said motion was entered on December 11, 1935, and the appeal is prosecuted to this court from the latter order, the petition in error being filed herein under date of April 1, 1936.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the cause' was tried upon an agreed statement of facts and the filing and determination of a motion for new trial was unauthorized and served no purpose to extend the time in which an appeal could be filed from the original judgment of the court dated the 2nd day of October, 1934.

The motion to dismiss must be sustained. See Sbowalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192, 253 P. 105; City of Ada v. Carter, 162 Okla. 23, 18 P. (2d) 1051; Setzvr v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70, 22 P. (2d) 998; Cannon v. Cannon, 173 'Okla. 366, 40 P. (2d) 649.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., and BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. OSBORN, V. C. J., and RILEY and BAY-LESS, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Investors Syndicate v. Graham, 1936 OK 756, 62 P.2d 986, 178 Okla. 259, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 562 (Okla. 1936).

1936 OK 756 (State Ex Rel. Investors Syndicate v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alsip v. City of Chandler
408 P.2d 512 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1965)
Kiowa County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
301 P.2d 677 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1956)
State Ex Rel. Investors' Syndicate v. Graham
1936 OK 853 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)