State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

708 N.W.2d 496, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 17, 2006 WL 134023
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 19, 2006
DocketA05-2540
StatusPublished

This text of 708 N.W.2d 496 (State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 708 N.W.2d 496, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 17, 2006 WL 134023 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

*497 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of the State of Minnesota for accelerated review filed in the above-entitled matter be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant. Appellant’s brief shall be served and filed 21 days from the date of this order; respondents’ briefs shall be served and filed within 21 days after service of appellant’s brief; a reply brief, if any, shall be served and filed within 7 days after service of the last respondent’s brief. Briefs shall be served and filed in the quantity and form contained in Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 131 and 132. The case will be placed on the April 2006 calendar for argument before this court.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice

HANSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group
708 N.W.2d 496 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 N.W.2d 496, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 17, 2006 WL 134023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-humphrey-v-philip-morris-usa-inc-minn-2006.