Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Guilbert v. Kauffman

State ex rel. Guilbert v. Kauffman

67 N.E. 1062, 1 Ohio Law Rep. 581, 68 Ohio St. 635, 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 635, 1903 Ohio LEXIS 232
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 25, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 67 N.E. 1062 (State ex rel. Guilbert v. Kauffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Guilbert v. Kauffman, 67 N.E. 1062, 1 Ohio Law Rep. 581, 68 Ohio St. 635, 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 635, 1903 Ohio LEXIS 232 (Ohio 1903).

Opinion

By the COURT.

BurKet, C. J., Spear, Davis, Si-iaucK, Prioe and Crew, JJ-, concur.

Section 4364-9, Kevised Statutes, imposed a tax on the business of trafficking in any intoxicating liquors, and also on the business of trafficking in spirituous, vinous or malt liquors. The generic term “malt liquors” includes both non-intoxicating and intoxicating malt liquors. The statute was declared to be constitutional in Adler v. Whitbeck, 44 Ohio St., 539, and in Anderson v. Brewster, 44 Ohio St., 576, 581. Tire petition therefore states facts sufficient to warrant the relief prayed for, and the demurrer is overruled and a iier-emptory writ' of mandamus is awarded as prayed.

Peremptory mandamus awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Speer
23 P.2d 239 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1933)
City of Chicago v. Murphy
144 N.E. 802 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1924)
Jacob Hoffmann Brewing Co. v. McElligott
259 F. 321 (S.D. New York, 1919)
State v. Hemrich
161 P. 79 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Ex Parte Peede
170 S.W. 749 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
State v. Walder
83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 68 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1910)
Fuller v. City of Jackson
52 So. 873 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1910)
LaFollette v. Murray
81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 474 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1910)
Wilder v. State
12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 404 (Fulton Circuit Court, 1909)
Walder v. State
21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 420 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1909)
State v. Walder
10 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 497 (Fulton County Court of Common Pleas, 1909)
Murray v. Lafollette
21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 247 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1909)
Commonwealth v. Goodwin
64 S.E. 54 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 N.E. 1062, 1 Ohio Law Rep. 581, 68 Ohio St. 635, 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 635, 1903 Ohio LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-guilbert-v-kauffman-ohio-1903.