State Ex Rel. Freeling v. Brewer
This text of 1923 OK 888 (State Ex Rel. Freeling v. Brewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This action was tried in the county court of Kiowa county at the October, 1920, term, and resulted in judgment sustaining the demurrer of defendant to the evidence of the plaintiff. Petition in error was filed in this court April 8, 1921, having attached thereto a purported case-made. An examination of the ease-made, so filed with the petition in error, .shows that the same was never filed as a part of the record in the ease iu the trial court nor was it settled or signed as a case-made by the trial judge, nor was it certified as a transcript by the court clerk. Under such circumstances it has been often held by this court that such' purported .case-made is a nullity and confers no jurisdiction upon this court to review the proceedings of the trial court. Quoting from the case of Hall et al. v. Phoenix Insurance Co., 82 Okla. 158, 198 Pac. 999, this court* said:
“A purported case-made which has not been settled and signed by the judge who tried the case and attested by the clerk and filed with the papers of the case in the trial court, is ineffective as a case-made and confers no jurisdiction upon this court to review any of the proceedings of the trial court. Oil Fields & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Wheeler, 75 Okla. 9, 180 Pac 868; Helms v. Faulkner, 79 Okla. 308, 193 Pac. 621; Canfield v. Bell, 47 Okla. 622, 149 Pac. 1088; Landis v. Beal & Hines, 43 Okla. 287, 142 Pac. 1109; Abbott v. Rodgers, 35 Okla. 189, 128 Pac. 908: Upton v. American Trust Co., 31 Okla. 456, 122 Pac. 159..”'
“Where the proceedings in error are by transcript of the record, the transcript must be certified as such by the clerk of the trial court.” Buell v. American Indemnity Co., 72 Oklahoma, 178 Pac. 884.
For the reasons herein stated, this appeal is dismissed.
' By the Court: It is. so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1923 OK 888, 219 P. 895, 93 Okla. 143, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-freeling-v-brewer-okla-1923.