Abbott v. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Abbott v. Rodgers

1912 OK 787, 128 P. 908, 35 Okla. 189, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 542

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 3, 1912

Docket4064

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 1912 OK 787 (Abbott v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbott v. Rodgers, 1912 OK 787, 128 P. 908, 35 Okla. 189, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 542 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

*190 WILLIAMS), J.

Counsel for defendant in error moves to dismiss this proceeding in error for the reason that neither the case-made attached to the petition in error nor a copy thereof was filed with the papers in the case below. The said motion was filed in this court on November 13, 1912, showing service on attorneys for the plaintiff in error on the 11th day of November, 1912. No response has been made to said motion.

Under the authority of St. Louis, I. M. & So. Ry. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701, 127 Pac. 478, the motion must be sustained.

See, also, Marple v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Nat. Bank, 28 Okla. 810, 115 Pac. 1124; Oligschalager v. Grell, 13 Okla. 632, 75 Pac. 1131.

The motion to dismiss this proceeding in error must therefore be sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI