Canfield v. Bell

1915 OK 480, 149 P. 1088, 47 Okla. 622, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 204
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 15, 1915·No. 4841·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*623 HARDY, J.

This case comes on upon motion to dismiss appeal, because: (1) The case-made was not filed in the court below; (2) the certificate of the judge who tried the case was never attested by the clerk of the county court; and (3) the certificate of the alleged case-made does not affirmatively show that it contains a full, true, and correct transcript of the record in said cause.

It does not appear that the case-made was ever filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, as required by section 5242, Rev. Laws 1910, and, in the absence of a request for leave to withdraw case-made and file same as required by said statute, it will be stricken from the files of this court; and, not being properly certified as a transcript, the petition in error is dismissed. Abbott .v Rogers, 35 Okla. 189, 128 Pac. 908; Peck v. Stephens, 35 Okla. 468, 130 Pac. 276; Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443, 141 Pac. 779.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Canfield v. Bell, 1915 OK 480, 149 P. 1088, 47 Okla. 622, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 204 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 480 (Canfield v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Freeling v. Brewer
1923 OK 888 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Hall v. Phoenix Ins. Co.
1921 OK 229 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Wyant v. Beavers
1915 OK 510 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)