State ex rel. Detty v. Adkins
This text of 2012 Ohio 1524 (State ex rel. Detty v. Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Detty v. Adkins, 2012-Ohio-1524.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY
State ex rel. John L. Detty, : Prosecuting Attorney of Jackson County, Ohio,, : Case No. 11CA3
Relator, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY v. :
Larry R. Adkins, Jr., : RELEASED 03/23/12
Respondent. :
Appearance:
John L. Detty, Prosecuting Attorney, Jackson County, Ohio, pro se.
Harsha, A.J.
Relator John L. Detty, Prosecuting Attorney of Jackson County, Ohio, has filed a
complaint seeking a writ of quo warranto against Respondent Larry R. Adkins, Jr. Detty
asks this court to oust Adkins from the office of township trustee for Jefferson Township
in Jackson County, Ohio, based on his felony level convictions in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. Although Adkins did
not file an answer to the complaint or a brief, the relator has not moved for default
judgment. Therefore, we proceed to address the merits of the complaint. Because
Adkins is incompetent to hold office due to his convictions, we find merit in the
complaint. Accordingly, we GRANT the writ.
I. Jackson App. No. 11CA3 2
Adkins is currently serving as an elected township trustee of Jefferson Township
in Jackson County, Ohio. On July 13, 2010, Adkins pled guilty to one count of
committing depredation against United States Forest Service property in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1361, and one count of willfully and knowingly stealing United States property
valued in excess of $1,000.00 in violation of 18 U.S.C. §641. The trial court sentenced
Adkins to three years of probation, including six months of home confinement with
electronic monitoring, and ordered that he pay restitution in the amount of $43,844.62.
II.
Quo warranto is the exclusive means for litigating a person’s right to hold a public
office. State ex rel. Battin v. Bush, 40 Ohio St.3d 236, 238, 533 N.E.2d 301 (1988).
R.C. 2733.05 authorizes a prosecuting attorney to bring a quo warranto action upon his
own relation. The remedy afforded in quo warranto is that of ouster of the respondent
from public office pursuant to R.C. 2733.14.
Detty argues that this Court should grant the writ of quo warranto because
Adkins is no longer entitled to hold office pursuant to R.C. 2961.01. R.C. 2961.01(A)(1)
states:
A person who pleads guilty to a felony under the laws of this or any other state or the United States and whose plea is accepted by the court * * * is incompetent to be an elector or juror or to hold an office of honor, trust, or profit.
The evidence submitted by Detty reflects that Adkins pled guilty to violations of 18
U.S.C. § 1361 and 18 U.S.C. § 641 in federal court. Detty has not disputed this
evidence or demonstrated that, despite his convictions, his right to hold office has been
restored pursuant to R.C. 2961.01(A)(2)(the full pardon of a person who is incompetent
to hold an office under division (A)(1) restores the rights and privileges forfeited under Jackson App. No. 11CA3 3
division (A)(1)).
III.
Because we conclude that Adkins is no longer competent to hold the office of
township trustee for Jefferson Township based on his convictions in federal court, we
GRANT the petition for quo warranto and oust Adkins from his position as township
trustee. A vacancy is declared for this particular seat which may be filled pursuant to
law.
The clerk is ORDERED to serve a copy of this entry on all counsel of record by
ordinary mail. The clerk shall serve respondent by certified mail, return receipt
requested. If returned unserved, the clerk shall serve respondent by ordinary mail. SO
ORDERED. WRIT GRANTED. COSTS TO RELATOR.
Abele, P.J. & Kline, J.: Concur.
FOR THE COURT
______________________________ William H. Harsha Administrative Judge
NOTICE
This document constitutes a final judgment entry and the time period for appeal commences from the date of filing with the clerk.
Pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B), the clerk is ORDERED to serve notice of the judgment and its date of entry upon the journal on all parties who are not in default for failure to appear. Within three (3) days after journalization of this entry, the clerk is required to serve notice of the judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 5(B), and shall note the service in the appearance docket.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 1524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-detty-v-adkins-ohioctapp-2012.