State ex rel. Culgan v. Kimbler

2012 Ohio 3310, 132 Ohio St. 3d 480
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 24, 2012
Docket2012-0465
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 2012 Ohio 3310 (State ex rel. Culgan v. Kimbler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Culgan v. Kimbler, 2012 Ohio 3310, 132 Ohio St. 3d 480 (Ohio 2012).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Clifford J. Culgan, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Medina County Court of Common Pleas Judge James Kimbler and the common pleas court, to issue a valid, final judgment in one of his criminal cases and to vacate his sentence in another of his criminal cases. “Neither mandamus nor procedendo will lie to compel an act that has already been performed.” State ex rel. Lester v. Pepple, 130 Ohio St.3d 353, 2011-Ohio-5756, 958 N.E.2d 566, ¶ 1. Culgan’s sentencing entries constitute final, appealable orders because they each set forth his convictions, the sentence, the judge’s signature, and the time stamp indicating the entry upon the journal by the clerk. State ex rel. Jones v. Ansted, 131 Ohio St.3d 125, 2012-Ohio-109, 961 N.E.2d 192, ¶ 2; State v. Lester, 130 Ohio *481 St.3d 303, 2011-Ohio-5204, 958 N.E.2d 142, paragraph one of the syllabus. And the court of appeals did not violate his right to due process and the ex post facto provisions of the United States and Ohio Constitutions. The sentences that Culgan challenges complied with Crim.R. 32(C) by specifying that he was convicted upon his no-contest pleas. Id. at ¶ 15-16, citing State v. Baker, 119 Ohio St.3d 197, 2008-Ohio-3330, 893 N.E.2d 163. Finally, insofar as Culgan argues that one of his sentences is erroneous because there is no authorization for consecutive six-month jail sentences, he had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claim of sentencing error. State ex rel. Hudson v. Sutula, 131 Ohio St.3d 177, 2012-Ohio-554, 962 N.E.2d 798.

Clifford J. Culgan, pro se. Dean Holman, Medina County Prosecuting Attorney, and Matthew Kern, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Townsend v. Gaul
2023 Ohio 1485 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
State ex rel. Chapman v. Gallagher
2023 Ohio 379 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
State ex rel. Miller v. Bower (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 1623 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)
State ex rel. Carter v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas.
2016 Ohio 3328 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
State ex rel. Keith v. Russo
2014 Ohio 5346 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Smith v. Court of Common Pleas
2014 Ohio 2070 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Thompson v. Saffold
2014 Ohio 838 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State ex rel. Allen v. Sutula
2014 Ohio 505 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Gabel v. Ambrose
2013 Ohio 3256 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
State ex rel. Nash v. Fuerst
2013 Ohio 3254 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
State ex rel. Porter v. Jensen
2013 Ohio 998 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
State ex rel. Grinnell v. Reece
2013 Ohio 733 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
State ex rel. Eubank v. McDonald
2013 Ohio 72 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 3310, 132 Ohio St. 3d 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-culgan-v-kimbler-ohio-2012.