State ex rel. Keith v. Russo

2014 Ohio 5346
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 2, 2014
Docket101901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 Ohio 5346 (State ex rel. Keith v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Keith v. Russo, 2014 Ohio 5346 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Keith v. Russo, 2014-Ohio-5346.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101901

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. JEFFREY C. KEITH

RELATOR

vs.

JUDGE JOSEPH D. RUSSO

RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 479123 Order No. 479813

RELEASED DATE: December 2, 2014 -i- FOR RELATOR

Jeffrey C. Keith, pro se Inmate #334-054 Marion Correctional Institution P.O. Box 57 Marion, Ohio 43301

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 9th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.:

{¶1} Jeffrey Keith has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Keith seeks an order

from this court that requires Judge Joseph D. Russo to grant motions to vacate void judgments

that were filed on the following cases: State v. Keith, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-94-316724-ZA;

State v. Keith, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-96-333972-ZA; and State v. Keith, Cuyahoga C.P. No.

CR-97-350831-ZA.

{¶2} Attached to Judge Russo’s motion for summary judgment are copies of judgment

entries in each case that were journalized on October 8, 2014. Respondent has demonstrated that

rulings have been rendered with regard to each motion. Keith is not entitled to a writ of

mandamus because it is moot. State ex rel. Culgan v. Kimbler, 132 Ohio St.3d 480,

2012-Ohio-3310, 974 N.E.2d 88 (a writ of mandamus will not be issued to compel an act already

performed); see also State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 8th Dist.

Cuyahoga No. 99259, 2013-Ohio-1567, ¶ 2. Although Keith sought a writ of mandamus that

would compel respondent to grant the motions, he is not entitled to this relief. Mandamus will not

be issued to compel respondent judge to enter a specific judgment on a motion. State ex rel. Avery

v. Union Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 125 Ohio St.3d 35, 2010-Ohio-1427, 925 N.E.2d 969.

{¶3} Judge Russo’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Costs to respondent.

Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with notice of this judgment

and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶4} Writ denied.

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, JUDGE MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J., and MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Keith v. Gaul
2015 Ohio 3480 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ohio 5346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-keith-v-russo-ohioctapp-2014.