State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-Kelley
This text of 881 N.E.2d 870 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion for leave to file supplemental briefing,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Both relator and respondent shall file a supplemental brief addressing what implications, if any, House Bill 214 has on the issues in this case. Both relator and respondent shall file their briefs no later than Thursday, March 6, 2008. The Clerk shall refuse to file any requests for extension of time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
881 N.E.2d 870, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cincinnati-enquirer-v-jones-kelley-ohio-2008.