State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-Kelley

881 N.E.2d 870, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1415
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-Kelley. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 Ohio St. 3d 81
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 2008·No. 2006-2239·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion for leave to file supplemental briefing,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Both relator and respondent shall file a supplemental brief addressing what implications, if any, House Bill 214 has on the issues in this case. Both relator and respondent shall file their briefs no later than Thursday, March 6, 2008. The Clerk shall refuse to file any requests for extension of time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-Kelley, 881 N.E.2d 870, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2008).

881 N.E.2d 870 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.