State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen
This text of 2012 Ohio 2571 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen, 132 Ohio St.3d 126, 2012-Ohio-2571.]
THE STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. ALLEN, JUDGE. [Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen, 132 Ohio St.3d 126, 2012-Ohio-2571.] Cause dismissed based on mootness. (No. 2011-1643—Submitted May 22, 2012—Decided June 13, 2012.) IN MANDAMUS. __________________ {¶ 1} Upon consideration of the parties’ evidence and briefs, this cause is dismissed based on mootness. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Graydon Head & Ritchey, L.L.P., and John C. Greiner, for relators. Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J. Schaefer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 2571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cincinnati-enquirer-v-allen-ohio-2012.