State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen, 132 Ohio St.3d 126, 2012-Ohio-2571.]
THE STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. ALLEN, JUDGE. [Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen, 132 Ohio St.3d 126, 2012-Ohio-2571.] Cause dismissed based on mootness. (No. 2011-1643—Submitted May 22, 2012—Decided June 13, 2012.) IN MANDAMUS. __________________ {¶ 1} Upon consideration of the parties’ evidence and briefs, this cause is dismissed based on mootness. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Graydon Head & Ritchey, L.L.P., and John C. Greiner, for relators. Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J. Schaefer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2012 Ohio 2571 (State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.