Standard Ins. Co. v. McKee

201 S.W.2d 627, 1947 Tex. App. LEXIS 897
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 28, 1947
DocketNo. 2579
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 S.W.2d 627 (Standard Ins. Co. v. McKee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Ins. Co. v. McKee, 201 S.W.2d 627, 1947 Tex. App. LEXIS 897 (Tex. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

I. R. McKee was employed by the Valley Osage Oil Company to drill its well No. 8 in Shackelford County under a contract partly written and partly oral. The written portion is shown by a letter, from McKee to the oil company, the material portions of which are as follows: ,

“This is to outline Mr. Branscum and my. agreement for me to drill a well on your Alexander lease in Shackelford County, Texas.
“I am to drill a well on your lease to the depth of 900 feet, unless oil or gas is encountered at a lesser depth for the price of $2.25 per foot, and $40.00 per 8-hour tour for day work. I will furnish all water, slush pit, fuel, water and 8" and 7“ casing, but you are to furnish the oil string and pay for any pipe that is left in the hole. I will carry Workmen’s Compensation and Liability Insurance. Drilling is to start within 30 days from this date.”

Under the same contract he drilled said oil company’s well No. 9, and had nearly completed the drilling of .its well No. 10 when, while preparing to sharpen a bit owned by him, his clothing became ignited and he was severely burned. While drilling the wells to the depth of 900 feet, or until oil or.gas was encountered at a lesser depth, both the material and labor necessary for drilling the well were furnished by McKee, and he carried workmen’s compensation on his employees engaged in drilling the wells. The oil company carried workmen’s compensation on its employees with appellant. McKee, claiming to be an employee of the oil company at the time he was burned, brought suit to recover compensation as an employee of the Valley Osage Oil Company under the Woxkmen’s Compensation Law. Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. Art. 8306 et seq. The case was submitted to a jury, and it answered all issues submitted in favor of McKee. It found that McKee at the time he was injured was an employee of the oil company and that he was not an independent contractor. Judgment was rendered for McKee, . and the insurance company has appealed.

Appellant presents four points, all of which in- effect present the contention that the evidence was insufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether or not at the [628]*628time McKee was burned he was an employee of the oil company; or stated differently, that the evidence showed conclusively, that is, as a matter of law, that at said time McKee was an independent contractor.

We shall assume that until the contract depth was reached or the pay sand was encountered and the oil company’s superintendent, Mr. Branscum, arrived at the well that McKee was an independent contractor. Appellee contends that if prior to that time McKee was an independent contractor, nevertheless, after the contract depth had been reached (under which McKee was to drill the well for $2.25 per foot) and when McKee commenced work in the pay sand and began doing those things for which, under the contract, he was to be paid “$40.00 per 8-hour tour for day work”, that he was then acting as an employee of the oil company and ceased to act as an independent contractor.

Under a comparable situation, our Supreme Court has held that it is necessary in answering the question presented to consider not only the evidence as to the terms of the contract of employment when made but also ■ the testimony with reference to the control actually exercised by the alleged employer. The court said, “It is relevant and admissible as tending to prove what the contract really contemplated”. Southern Underwriters v. Samanie, 137 Tex. 531, 155 S.W.2d 359, 362. See also Lloyds Guarantee Assur. v. Sheffield et al., Tex.Civ.App., 170 S.W.2d 327 (Writ Ref.).

In accord with the decisions just cited, we call attention to the following evidence deemed pertinent on the question of the right of control of'the alleged employee at the time of his injury and relevant to the question whether or not there was evidence supporting the jury’s finding that McKee was an employee of the oil company when he was burned.

H. L. Branscum, Superintendent for the Valley Osage Oil Company, testified as follows:'

“Q. Mr. Branscum; you are an experienced oil field man, aren’t you? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. You have been at the oil business how long? A. Twenty-four years.
* * * * * *
“Q. You know how that work should be done ? A. Yes, sir.
* * * * * *
“Q. And when you get a well on the day basis, like Mr. McKee’s here, it is up to you to determine how deep the well shall go, is it not? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And it is up to you to see that the production is had after you reach the pay zone? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And with that purpose in mind you take over the operation and the management of the rig? A. Not necessarily the operation and management of the rig.
“Q. And while ago I believe you testified that you told Mr. McKee or his men, whoever was running the rig to pull the tubing out and put it back in? A. Yes, sir. ■ •
“Q. You determine that? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And you determine how that shall be done?, A. Yes, sir.
“Q. You are the man who -determines when the cement shall go in there? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And how much cement shall be mixed to make your-plug? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And you tell the men how to put it in the hole and where to put it in, don’t you? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And in making your determination of when the plug shall be drilled and how far you shall go into the pay zone, you give them instructions on that? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And tell them when to go in the hole and when to come out? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. On this particular morning that Mr. McKee was hurt you saw him in the hotel before he went out there? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And you told him to go out and get the tools strung up and to go ahead and drill the plug, didn’t you? A. Told him to go out and string the tools up and get ready to swab the water off of the formation.
[629]*629“Q. You told him to get ready to swab the water out? A. Yes sir. To string up the tools and get ready to swab the water out.
“Q. In other words, you figured then that you would be out there by the time they actually commenced the operation? A. That’s right. .
“Q. Because you felt responsible for the well, if something should happen to it, at this stage of the game didn’t you? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. And in your capacity as Superintendent of the Valley Osage Oil Company you wanted to see that production was had ? A. Yes, sir.
“Q. After you had gotten down that deep, didn’t you? A. Yes, sir.”

H.JVL Hatfield .testified as follows:

“Q. Let me back up and ask it this way then; after the contract depth was-reached what did you then do with respect to the development of the well? A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Insurance v. McKee
205 S.W.2d 362 (Texas Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 S.W.2d 627, 1947 Tex. App. LEXIS 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-ins-co-v-mckee-texapp-1947.