Stamper v. Kogelschatz

137 A. 127, 289 Pa. 94, 1927 Pa. LEXIS 529
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1927
DocketAppeal, 319
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 137 A. 127 (Stamper v. Kogelschatz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stamper v. Kogelschatz, 137 A. 127, 289 Pa. 94, 1927 Pa. LEXIS 529 (Pa. 1927).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Appearing specially for the purpose, defendant filed an affidavit of defense raising a question of law as to whether or not the summons in the case, which had been issued by one of the courts of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, had been properly served in Montgomery County, by its sheriff, upon special deputizalion by the sheriff of the former county. The court below overruled defendant’s contention, and gave him fifteen- days to file an affidavit of defense on the merits. Without doing this, he prosecuted the present appeal.

The judgment thus entered is interlocutory, and, under the circumstances here appearing, an appeal cannot properly be taken therefrom until after a final judgment has been entered in the case: Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co., 275 Pa. 40; American Trust Co. v. Kaufman, 279 Pa. 230, 233.

The Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, does not aid defendant. Proceedings under it can only be “by petition setting forth the facts relied upon, whereupon a rule to show cause shall be granted, and such preliminary question [of jurisdiction over the defendant, or of the cause of action for which suit is brought] disposed of by the court.” No such course was pursued in the instant case, *96 and hence the statute cannot be invoked to sustain the present appeal: Wilson v. Garland, 267 Pa. 291.

The appeal is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Creighan v. Pittsburgh
132 A.2d 867 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Hamilton v. Police Beneficiary Ass'n
40 A.2d 152 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Stokes v. Giarraputo & Son
42 Pa. D. & C. 597 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1941)
Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.
330 Pa. 336 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Mass. B. I. Co. v. J. H., Inc.
199 A. 216 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Nagle v. Nagle
166 A. 649 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Lewis v. Beatty
159 A. 441 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Berkin
149 A. 470 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Deardorff v. Continental Life Insurance Co.
146 A. 816 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Specktor v. North British & Mercantile Insurance
142 A. 212 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Solar Electric Co.'s Appeal
138 A. 914 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A. 127, 289 Pa. 94, 1927 Pa. LEXIS 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stamper-v-kogelschatz-pa-1927.