Deardorff v. Continental Life Insurance Co.
146 A. 816, 297 Pa. 289, 1929 Pa. LEXIS 405
Opinion
In this case, suit was instituted on an insurance policy, an affidavit of defense raising questions of law was *290 filed, the court below decided against defendant, “with leave to file a supplemental affidavit of defense to the averments of fact,” and this appeal followed. In Stamper v. Kogelschatz, 289 Pa. 94, 95, we decided that an order such as here appealed from was interlocutory and no appeal could be taken therefrom.
The appeal is quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Deardorff v. Continental Life Insurance Co., 146 A. 816, 297 Pa. 289, 1929 Pa. LEXIS 405 (Pa. 1929).
146 A. 816 (Deardorff v. Continental Life Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Creighan v. Pittsburgh
132 A.2d 867 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Hair v. Ference
42 A.2d 535 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Hamilton v. Police Beneficiary Ass'n
40 A.2d 152 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Herman v. World Fire & Marine Insurance
189 A. 521 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)