Stafford v. State
648 So. 2d 806, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778, 1994 WL 718769
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1994·No. No. 94-900·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The judgment and sentence are affirmed. The First Step deposit and the public defender’s hen are vacated without prejudice for the court to reimpose them upon compliance with controlling law. Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Botts v. State, 634 So.2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stafford v. State, 648 So. 2d 806, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778, 1994 WL 718769 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
648 So. 2d 806 (Stafford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metz v. State
650 So. 2d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McKinlay v. McKinlay
648 So. 2d 806 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)