Metz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Metz v. State

650 So. 2d 1135, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2295, 1995 WL 94376

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 9, 1995

DocketNo. 93-3869

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 650 So. 2d 1135 (Metz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metz v. State, 650 So. 2d 1135, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2295, 1995 WL 94376 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

From our examination of the testimonial record, we conclude that the trial court properly denied Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm the final judgment and sentence in all respects, except for the assessment of $1.00 to go to First Step, Inc., which must be stricken, without prejudice for the trial court to reimpose this cost if it can demonstrate a proper statutory basis therefor. State v. Beasley, 580 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991); Stafford v. State, 648 So.2d 806 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bradshaw v. State, 638 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Judgment and sentence AFFIRMED; costs relating to First Step, Inc. VACATED.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

From our examination of the testimonial record, we conclude that the trial court properly denied Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm the final judgment and sentence in all respects, except for the assessment of $1.00 to go to First Step, Inc., which must be stricken, without prejudice for the trial court to reimpose this cost if it can demonstrate a proper statutory basis therefor. State v. Beasley, 580 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991); Stafford v. State, 648 So.2d 806 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bradshaw v. State, 638 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Judgment and sentence AFFIRMED; costs relating to First Step, Inc. VACATED.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 So. 2d 1135, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2295, 1995 WL 94376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metz-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack