Renaud v. State
This text of 660 So. 2d 408 (Renaud v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant raises a number of issues on appeal, only two of which demonstrate reversible error. The first is that the trial court erred by imposing costs and fees on a per count basis instead of imposing costs as to the entire case. Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The trial court also erred by ordering appellant to pay $1.00 a month to First Step, Inc. where said fee was not statutorily authorized. See Metz v. State, 650 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
We, therefore, remand with directions to strike the duplicative costs as well as the unauthorized fee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
660 So. 2d 408, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9768, 1995 WL 548856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renaud-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.