Stafford v. City of Valdosta
172 S.E. 461, 178 Ga. 224, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 21
Opinion
Since this ease raises only a question as to the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance of the City of Valdosta, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction, to decide the questions raised by the bill of exceptions. The ruling in this [225]*225case is controlled by the decision in Thompson v. Atlanta, 176 Ga. 489 (168 S. E. 312).
Transferred to Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stafford v. City of Valdosta, 172 S.E. 461, 178 Ga. 224, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 21 (Ga. 1934).
172 S.E. 461 (Stafford v. City of Valdosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Columbus v. Atlanta Cigar Co.
140 S.E.2d 267 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Dade County v. State of Georgia
46 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
Reliable Transfer Company v. May
29 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Bunn v. City of Atlanta
16 S.E.2d 539 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Hicks v. City of Dublin
188 S.E. 339 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Maner v. Dykes
187 S.E. 699 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)