Hicks v. City of Dublin

188 S.E. 339, 183 Ga. 390, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 243
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1936·No. No. 11388·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Russell, Chief Justice.

It appears from an examination of the record that the writ of error in this case is based upon the refusal of the judge of the superior court to grant a certiorari from, a judgment of the recorder’s court of the City of Dublin, in which the plaintiff in error was convicted of a violation of a municipal [391]*391ordinance of that city. The ordinance is attacked as in violation of a named portion of the constitution of Georgia, and of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States. Since this case raises only a question as to the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance of the city, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to decide the question raised by the bill of exceptions. Thompson v. Atlanta, 176 Ga. 489 (168 S. E. 312); Stafford v. Valdosta, 178 Ga. 224 (172 S. E. 461); Maner v. Dykes, 183 Ga. 118 (187 S. E. 699); Wright v. Macon, 5 Ga. App. 750 (64 S. E. 807). Accordingly, it is ordered that the bill of exceptions and transcript of the record be

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. City of Dublin, 188 S.E. 339, 183 Ga. 390, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 243 (Ga. 1936).

188 S.E. 339 (Hicks v. City of Dublin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. MAYOR & BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF ATLANTA
136 S.E.2d 342 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Dade County v. State of Georgia
46 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
City Council of Augusta v. Garrison
20 S.E.2d 430 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Bunn v. City of Atlanta
16 S.E.2d 539 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Jewel Tea Co. v. City Council
197 S.E. 235 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)