Hicks v. City of Dublin
This text of 188 S.E. 339 (Hicks v. City of Dublin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears from an examination of the record that the writ of error in this case is based upon the refusal of the judge of the superior court to grant a certiorari from, a judgment of the recorder’s court of the City of Dublin, in which the plaintiff in error was convicted of a violation of a municipal [391]*391ordinance of that city. The ordinance is attacked as in violation of a named portion of the constitution of Georgia, and of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States. Since this case raises only a question as to the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance of the city, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to decide the question raised by the bill of exceptions. Thompson v. Atlanta, 176 Ga. 489 (168 S. E. 312); Stafford v. Valdosta, 178 Ga. 224 (172 S. E. 461); Maner v. Dykes, 183 Ga. 118 (187 S. E. 699); Wright v. Macon, 5 Ga. App. 750 (64 S. E. 807). Accordingly, it is ordered that the bill of exceptions and transcript of the record be
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 S.E. 339, 183 Ga. 390, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-city-of-dublin-ga-1936.