St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company

Opinion

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP James P. Wagoner, #58553 Kevin D. Hansen, #119831 Brandon M. Fish, #203880 7647 North Fresno Street Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300

Attorneys for Plaintiff New York Marine and General Insurance Company

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE Case No. 1:20-cv-00967-JLT-BAK INSURANCE COMPANY, (BAM) Plaintiff, Consolidated With Case No. 1:20-cv- 01085-NONE-JLT KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED Defendant. PROTECTIVE ORDER Hon. Jennifer L. Thurston NEW YORK MARINE AND Complaint Filed: August 5, 2020 GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Trial Date: None a Delaware corporation, [Concurrently Filed With Stipulation To Plaintiff, Lift Stay For Limited Purpose Of Obtaining A Protective Order; v. Declaration of James P. Wagoner] KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation,

Defendant.

TRC OPERATING COMPANY, INC., a California corporation, TRC CYPRESS GROUP, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company,

Real PARTIES in Interest.

Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) in case no. 1:20-cv-00967- NONE-JLT, Plaintiff New York Marine and General Insurance Company (“New York Marine”) in case no. 1:20-cv-01085-NONE-JLT, Defendant Kinsale Insurance Company (“Kinsale”) in case nos. 1:20-cv-00967-NONE-JLT and 1:20-cv-01085- NONE-JLT, and Real Parties in Interest TRC Operating Company, Inc. and TRC Cypress Group, LLC (collectively referred to as the “TRC Entities”) in case no. 1:20-cv-01085-NONE-JLT (St. Paul, New York Marine, Kinsale and the TRC Entities are collectively referred to as the “PARTIES”), through their undersigned counsel, jointly submit this Stipulated Protective Order (“PROTECTIVE ORDER”) to govern the handling of information and materials produced in the course of discovery or filed with the Court in advance of trial in this ACTION. DISCLOSURE and discovery activity in this ACTION are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the PARTIES to this ACTION hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following The PARTIES acknowledge that this PROTECTIVE ORDER does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under established legal principles. The PARTIES further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this PROTECTIVE ORDER does not automatically entitle them to file confidential information under seal; rather Eastern District Local Rule 141 sets forth PARTY seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. Nothing in this PROTECTIVE ORDER shall be deemed an admission by any PARTY that certain categories or types of DOCUMENTS or information contain proprietary or confidential information. Each PARTY retains the right to challenge any and all information designated “CONFIDENTIAL,” as defined in Paragraph 3.3 below, through the procedures detailed in this PROTECTIVE ORDER. Nothing in this PROTECTIVE ORDER shall be deemed a waiver of any such rights. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED, AND JOINTLY REQUESTED by and between the PARTIES to St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Kinsale Ins. Co. (Case No. 1:20-cv-00967-NONE-JLT) and New York Marine and General Ins. Co. v. Kinsale Ins. Co. (Case No. 1:20-cv-01085-NONE-JLT), which are consolidated as of February 2, 2021 (Dkt. No. 12), with the scheduling order issued in Case No. 1:20-cv-01085 NONE JLT controlling the consolidated action, by and through their respective counsel of record, that this COURT enter this PROTECTIVE ORDER to govern the proceedings in this ACTION for good cause shown and according to the following terms and provisions. II. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO L.R. 141.1(C) This ACTION is likely to involve CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary business and commercial information and trade secrets of the PARTIES, as well as sensitive and private information about PARTIES and NON-PARTIES for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution and defense of this ACTION is warranted. Such CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, CONFIDENTIAL business or financial information; information regarding CONFIDENTIAL business practices; other CONFIDENTIAL research, development, or commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third PARTIES); information otherwise generally unavailable to the public; federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the PARTIES are entitled to keep CONFIDENTIAL, to ensure that the PARTIES are permitted reasonably necessary use of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of proceedings in this ACTION, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the PARTIES that information will not be designated as CONFIDENTIAL for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good-faith belief that it has been maintained in a CONFIDENTIAL, nonpublic manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(1): Examples of CONFIDENTIAL information that the PARTIES may seek to protect from unrestricted or unprotected DISCLOSURE include: a) Information that is the subject of a non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement or obligation or subject to the mediation or settlement privileges; b) Agreements with third-parties, including liability coverage agreements, reservation of rights letters, underwriting information, insurance contracts and financial information (such as premium, rating information, and rating basis (e.g. gross sales), which may be set forth in insurance contracts); c) Information related to claims administration and management, including but not limited to costs, margins, or other internal financial/accounting information, including non-public information related to financial condition or performance and income or other non- d) Information related to past, current, and future market analyses and business and marketing development, including plans, strategies, forecasts and competition. e) All documents, materials and testimony marked confidential in the in the underlying litigation TRC Operating Company, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern, Case No.: S-1500-CV-282520-DRL. f) The TRC Entities’ trade secrets, business and financial information. Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(2): Generally speaking, information and DOCUMENTS shall only be designated under this PROTECTIVE ORDER because the DESIGNATING PARTY believes the information or DOCUMENTS are proprietary and/or CONFIDENTIAL that the DESIGNATING PARTY would not release publicly. Unrestricted or unprotected disclosure of such CONFIDENTIAL or commercial information would result in prejudice or harm to the PRODUCING PARTY by revealing the PRODUCING PARTY’s methods for items such as insurance claims administration and claims management, marketing of insurance products, methodology for underwriting insurance risks, actuarial information, including risk factors, rating and pricing of insurance policies, and insurance industry contacts. Such information will have been developed at the expense of the PRODUCING PARTY and represent valuable tangible and intangible assets of that PARTY. Additionally, privacy interests of Third Parties, such as financial information, must be safeguarded. Accordingly, the PARTIES respectfully submit that there is good cause for the entry of this PROTECTIVE ORDER. Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(3): The PARTIES submit that protecting the CONFIDENTIAL nature of information in this way will be most efficient for the PARTIES and the COURT. DOCUMENTS likely sought in the instant litigation are subject to a protective order in the underlying litigation TRC Operating Company, Kern, Case No.: S-1500-CV-282520-DRL. Additionally, the underlying litigation is still pending and the production of DOCUMENTS may prejudice the defense of the TRC Entities in that action. The PARTIES have met and conferred on this issue and agree that any private agreement between the PARTIES to safeguard this information will need to be replicated through orders of this COURT at the time of filing dispositive or non-dispositive motions. The burden shall be on the PARTY that designated information “CONFIDENTIAL” to take all steps necessary to protect that information in information filed with the Court. However, the PARTIES also agree that if a PARTY seeks to file information previously designated as CONFIDENTIAL under seal and the Court does not deem the information to be worthy of such protection, the PARTY may proceed with its filing containing otherwise CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS and information without an Order sealing the record so long as (a) the PARTY has made a good faith effort to obtain an Order sealing the record; and (b) the PARTY takes no further steps to draw public attention to the Court filing of information formerly designated as In this PROTECTIVE ORDER, the words set forth below shall have the following meanings: 3.1. “ACTION” or “PROCEEDING” means the above-entitled proceeding, consolidated case no. 1:20-CV-00967-NONE-JLT. 3.2. “CHALLENGING PARTY” shall mean a PARTY or NON- PARTY that challenges the designation of information or items under this 3.3. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items means DOCUMENTS, materials, depositions or other TESTIMONY, deposition exhibits, interrogatory responses, responses to requests for admission, and other information PARTY believes in good faith contains or comprises any proprietary, confidential, or sensitive information that is related to research and development or is a trade secret or is of a commercial, technical, financial, or personal nature or qualifies for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(A-H). 3.4. “COUNSEL” shall mean OUTSIDE COUNSEL OF RECORD and IN-HOUSE COUNSEL (each as defined herein), as well as their respective support staff. 3.5. “COURT” shall mean the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division. 3.6. “DESIGNATING PARTY” means the PARTY that designates Materials as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 3.7. “DISCLOSE” or “DISCLOSED” or “DISCLOSURE” means to reveal, divulge, give, or make available Materials, or any part thereof, or any information contained therein. 3.8. “DISCLOSURE OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL” means all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, TESTIMONY, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 3.9. “DOCUMENTS” shall have the same meaning as the terms “documents and electronically stored information” as used in Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and include any “writing,” “recording,” “photograph,” “original,” or “duplicate,” as those terms are defined by Federal Rule of Evidence 1001. 3.10. “EXPERT” shall mean a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a PARTY or its COUNSEL to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this ACTION. 3.12. “IN-HOUSE COUNSEL” means attorneys who are employees of a PARTY to this ACTION. IN-HOUSE COUNSEL does not include OUTSIDE COUNSEL OF RECORD or any other outside counsel. 3.13. “NON-PARTY” or “NON-PARTIES” means any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a PARTY to this ACTION who/that agrees to be bound by this PROTECTIVE ORDER by signing the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached to this PROTECTIVE ORDER as Exhibit A. 3.14. “OUTSIDE COUNSEL OF RECORD” means attorneys who are not employees of a PARTY to this ACTION but are retained to represent or advise a PARTY to this ACTION and have appeared in this ACTION on behalf of that PARTY or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that 3.15. “PARTIES” shall mean Plaintiff New York Marine and General Insurance Company (“New York Marine”), Plaintiff St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”), Defendant Kinsale Insurance Company (“Kinsale”), and real PARTIES in interest TRC Operating Company, Inc. and TRC Cypress Group, LLC (collectively “TRC Entities”). 3.16. “PARTY” shall mean one of the aforementioned five PARTIES. 3.17. “PRODUCING PARTY” shall mean a PARTY or NON-PARTY that produces INFORMATION or other discovery material in this ACTION. 3.18. “PROFESSIONAL VENDORS” means persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 3.19. “PROTECTED MATERIAL” means any DISCLOSURE OF had that designation removed according to the terms of this PROTECTIVE 3.20. “PROTECTIVE ORDER” means this Stipulated Protective Order entered in the ACTION. 3.21. “RECEIVING PARTY” means a PARTY that receives DISCLOSURE OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL from a PRODUCING PARTY. 3.22. “TESTIMONY” means all depositions, declarations or other testimony taken or used in this PROCEEDING. 4.1 Scope. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and PROTECTIVE ORDER cover not only PROTECTED MATERIAL (as defined above), but also (1) any INFORMATION copied or extracted from PROTECTED MATERIAL; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of PROTECTED MATERIAL; and (3) any TESTIMONY, conversations, or presentations by PARTIES or their COUNSEL that might reveal PROTECTED MATERIAL. However, the protections conferred by this PROTECTIVE ORDER do not cover the following INFORMATION: (a) any INFORMATION that is in the public domain at the time of DISCLOSURE to a RECEIVING PARTY or becomes part of the public domain after its DISCLOSURE to a RECEIVING PARTY as a result of publication not involving a violation of this PROTECTIVE ORDER, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any INFORMATION known to the RECEIVING PARTY prior to the DISCLOSURE or obtained by the RECEIVING PARTY after the DISCLOSURE from a source who obtained the INFORMATION lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the DESIGNATING PARTY. Any use of PROTECTED MATERIAL at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4.2 Duration. Even after final disposition of this litigation, the effect until a DESIGNATING PARTY agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be upon (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this ACTION, with or without prejudice; or (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this ACTION, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5.1 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this PROTECTIVE ORDER or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, DISCLOSURE OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL that qualifies for protection under this PROTECTIVE ORDER must be clearly so designated before the material is DISCLOSED or produced. Designation in conformity with this PROTECTIVE ORDER requires: (a) for DOCUMENTS (e.g., paper or electronic DOCUMENTS, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the PRODUCING PARTY affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains PROTECTED MATERIAL. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the PRODUCING PARTY also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). A PARTY or NON-PARTY that makes original materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting PARTY has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting PARTY has identified the materials it wants copied and produced, the PRODUCING PARTY must determine which materials, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this PROTECTIVE ORDER. Then, before producing the specified materials, the PRODUCING PARTY MATERIAL. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the PRODUCING PARTY also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). (b) for TESTIMONY, that the DESIGNATING PARTY may either identify on the record all protected TESTIMONY, or may invoke, on the record or by written notice to all parties on or before the next business day, a right to have up to twenty-one (21) days from the deposition, hearing or proceeding to make its designation. The designation shall indicate the page and line numbers of any transcript of material deemed to be CONFIDENTIAL. (c) for INFORMATION produced in some form other than documentary and for any other tangible items, that the PRODUCING PARTY affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the INFORMATION or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the INFORMATION or item warrant protection, the PRODUCING PARTY, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s). (d) Parties shall give advance notice if they expect a deposition or other proceeding to include PROTECTED MATERIAL so that the other PARTIES can ensure that only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings when such material is disclosed or used. The use of a DOCUMENT as an exhibit at a deposition shall not in any way affect its designation. Transcripts containing PROTECTED MATERIAL shall have a legend on the title page noting the presence of PROTECTED MATERIAL, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated, and the level of protection being asserted. The DESIGNATING PARTY shall inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the expiration of the twenty-one (21) day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been designated CONFIDENTIAL unless otherwise agreed. only as actually designated. 5.2 Materials Subject to Designation. Each PARTY may designate any DOCUMENT, thing, interrogatory answer, admission, deposition TESTIMONY, and portions of such materials, or other INFORMATION which it has provided or which a NON-PARTY has provided as “CONFIDENTIAL” in accordance with this PROTECTIVE ORDER. In designating DOCUMENTS, TESTIMONY or INFORMATION as “CONFIDENTIAL,” the DESIGNATING PARTY’s COUNSEL shall make a good faith determination, before applying the designation, that the DOCUMENTS, TESTIMONY or INFORMATION warrants protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 5.3 Inadvertent Failure to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified INFORMATION or items does not, standing alone, waive the DESIGNATING PARTY’s right to secure protection under this PROTECTIVE ORDER for such material. If a DESIGNATING PARTY inadvertently fails to designate material which, in good faith, might otherwise be deemed CONFIDENTIAL, that DESIGNATING PARTY shall provide written notice of such designation within a reasonable time of discovering the inadvertent failure to so designate the material as CONFIDENTIAL. Any RECEIVING PARTY who objects to the late designation must do so in writing within seven (7) days of the late designation. In the absence of such an objection, the late designation shall be deemed timely and treated as if made within the time(s) set forth above. Upon timely assertion or correction of a designation, all recipients must make reasonable efforts to ensure that the materials are treated according to this PROTECTIVE ORDER. 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any PARTY or NON-PARTY may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time. Unless an immediate challenge to a foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a PARTY does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is DISCLOSED. 6.2 Meet and Confer. The CHALLENGING PARTY shall initiate the dispute resolution process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph of the PROTECTIVE ORDER. The PARTIES shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in a verbal dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the CHALLENGING PARTY must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the DESIGNATING PARTY an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A CHALLENGING PARTY may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the DESIGNATING PARTY is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner. 6.3 Joint Statement. If the PARTIES cannot resolve a challenge without court intervention, the CHALLENGING PARTY shall submit a challenge to the COURT via joint stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 251(c). The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the DESIGNATING PARTY. Unless the DESIGNATING PARTY has expressly waived the confidentiality designation, all PARTIES shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the PRODUCING 7.1 Basic Principles. A RECEIVING PARTY may use PROTECTED MATERIAL that is DISCLOSED or produced by another PARTY or by a NON- PARTY in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such PROTECTED MATERIAL may be DISCLOSED only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this PROTECTIVE ORDER. When the litigation has been terminated, a RECEIVING PARTY must comply with the provisions of section 12.4 below regarding final disposition. PROTECTED MATERIAL must be stored and maintained by a RECEIVING PARTY at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this PROTECTIVE ORDER. 7.2 DISCLOSURE of PROTECTED MATERIAL. Unless otherwise ordered by the COURT or permitted in writing by the DESIGNATING PARTY, a RECEIVING PARTY may DISCLOSE any INFORMATION or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: (a) the RECEIVING PARTY’s OUTSIDE COUNSEL OF RECORD, as well as employees of said OUTSIDE COUNSEL OF RECORD to whom it is reasonably necessary to DISCLOSE the INFORMATION for this ACTION; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including IN-HOUSE COUNSEL) of the RECEIVING PARTY to whom DISCLOSURE is reasonably necessary for this ACTION or who access the INFORMATION in the ordinary course of business; (c) EXPERTS (as defined in this PROTECTIVE ORDER) of the RECEIVING PARTY to whom DISCLOSURE is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (d) the COURT and its personnel; (e) court reporters in this PROCEEDING, to whom DISCLOSURE is reasonably necessary for this ACTION; (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and PROFESSIONAL VENDORS to whom DISCLOSURE is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (g) during their depositions, NON-PARTY witnesses in the ACTION to whom DISCLOSURE is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the DESIGNATING PARTY or ordered by the COURT. Pages of transcribed deposition TESTIMONY or exhibits to depositions that reveal PROTECTED MATERIAL must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be DISCLOSED to anyone except as permitted under this PROTECTIVE ORDER; (h) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information prior to its designation as CONFIDENTIAL; (i) a PARTY’s auditors, regulators, or reinsurers in connection with that PARTY’s regular business practices. VIII. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION 8.1 If a PARTY is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels DISCLOSURE of any PROTECTED MATERIAL, that PARTY must: (a) promptly notify in writing the DESIGNATING PARTY. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the PARTY who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this PROTECTIVE ORDER. Such notification shall include a copy of this PROTECTIVE ORDER; and (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the DESIGNATING PARTY whose PROTECTED MATERIAL may be affected. 8.2 If the DESIGNATING PARTY timely seeks a protective order, the PARTY served with the subpoena or court order shall not produce PROTECTED MATERIAL before a determination by the COURT from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the PARTY has obtained the DESIGNATING PARTY’s permission. The DESIGNATING PARTY shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its PROTECTED MATERIAL – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a RECEIVING PARTY in this ACTION to disobey a lawful directive from another court. IX. PROTECTED MATERIAL OF A NON-PARTY SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION 9.1 The terms of this PROTECTIVE ORDER are applicable to DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION or TESTIMONY produced by a NON-PARTY and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION or TESTIMONY are protected by the remedies and relief provided by this PROTECTIVE ORDER. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a NON-PARTY from seeking additional protections. 9.2 If a PARTY is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a NON-PARTY’s CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION or TESTIMONY in its possession, the PARTY shall: (a) promptly notify in writing the REQUESTING PARTY and the NON-PARTY that some or all of the DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION or TESTIMONY requested are subject to a confidentiality agreement with a NON- PARTY; (b) promptly provide the NON-PARTY with a copy of the PROTECTIVE ORDER in this ACTION, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION or TESTIMONY requested; and (c) make the DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION or TESTIMONY requested available for inspection by the NON-PARTY. 9.3 If the NON-PARTY fails to object or seek a protective order from this COURT within fourteen (14) days of receiving the notice and accompanying DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION or TESTIMONY, the RECEIVING PARTY may produce the NON-PARTY’s CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION or TESTIMONY responsive to the discovery request. If the NON-PARTY timely seeks a protective order, the RECEIVING PARTY shall not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the NON-PARTY before a determination by the COURT. Absent a court order to the contrary, the NON-PARTY shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this COURT of its PROTECTED MATERIAL. If a RECEIVING PARTY learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has DISCLOSED PROTECTED MATERIAL to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this PROTECTIVE ORDER, the RECEIVING PARTY must immediately (a) notify in writing the PRODUCING PARTY and the DESIGNATING PARTY (if not the same party) of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the PROTECTED MATERIAL, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized DISCLOSURES were made of all the terms of this PROTECTIVE ORDER, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to PROTECTED MATERIAL When a PRODUCING PARTY gives notice to RECEIVING PARTIES that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the RECEIVING PARTIES are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the PARTIES reach an agreement on the effect of DISCLOSURE of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the PARTIES may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted to the COURT. 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this PROTECTIVE ORDER abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the COURT in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this PROTECTIVE ORDER no PARTY waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this PROTECTIVE ORDER. Similarly, no PARTY waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this 12.3 Filing PROTECTED MATERIAL. Without written permission from the DESIGNATING PARTY or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a PARTY may not file in the public record in this ACTION any PROTECTED MATERIAL. A PARTY that seeks to file under seal any PROTECTED MATERIAL must follow the procedure set forth in Local Rule 141. PROTECTED MATERIAL may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific PROTECTED MATERIAL at issue. The fact that a document has been designated under this PROTECTIVE ORDER is insufficient to justify filing under seal. Instead, PARTIES must explain the basis for confidentiality of each document sought to be filed under seal. Because a PARTY other than the DESIGNATING PARTY will often be seeking to file PROTECTED MATERIAL, cooperation among the PARTIES in preparing, and in reducing the number and extent of, requests for under seal filing is essential. If a RECEIVING PARTY’s request to file PROTECTED MATERIAL under seal pursuant to Local Rule 141 is denied by the COURT, then the RECEIVING PARTY may file the material in the public record unless (1) the DESIGNATING PARTY seeks reconsideration within four (4) days of the denial, or (2) as otherwise instructed by the COURT. Notwithstanding the above, the filing PARTY shall, in good faith, refrain from drawing public attention to the COURT filing of information formerly designated as CONFIDENTIAL so long as the original designation was made in good faith. 12.4 Storage of Protected Information by RECEIVING PARTY. The recipient of any PROTECTED MATERIAL provided under this PROTECTIVE ORDER (including copies or excerpts made thereof) shall maintain such information in a secure and safe area, and shall exercise reasonable and proper care with respect to the storage, custody, use, and/or dissemination of such information. 12.5 Final Disposition. Within sixty (60) days after the final disposition of this ACTION, each RECEIVING PARTY must return all PROTECTED MATERIAL to the PRODUCING PARTY or make a good faith effort to destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, “all PROTECTED MATERIAL” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the PROTECTED MATERIAL. Whether the PROTECTED MATERIAL is returned or destroyed, the RECEIVING PARTY same person or entity, to the DESIGNATING PARTY) by the sixty (60) day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the PROTECTED MATERIAL that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the RECEIVING PARTY has not intentionally retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the PROTECTED MATERIAL. Notwithstanding the foregoing portion of this Section, (1) COUNSEL are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, email, deposition and trial exhibits, EXPERT reports, attorney work product, and consultant and EXPERT work product, even if such materials contain PROTECTED MATERIAL; and (2) the undersigned PARTIES may retain any PROTECTED MATERIAL to the extent necessary pursuant to legal requirements, professional duties or bona fide document retention policies, provided however that the PARTIES shall continue to be bound by the terms of this PROTECTIVE ORDER for such time period as they retain such PROTECTED MATERIAL. Any such archival copies or retained DOCUMENTS that contain or constitute PROTECTED MATERIAL remain subject to this PROTECTIVE ORDER as set forth in Section 4.2 regarding duration. Dated: January 26, 2022 McCLOSKEY, WARING, WAISMAN & DRURY LLP

By: /s/ Sonia S. Waisman (as approved 1/13/22) Sonia S. Waisman Attorneys for Plaintiff St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Dated: January 26, 2022 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

By: /s/ James P. Wagoner James P. Wagoner Kevin D. Hansen Brandon M. Fish Attorneys for Plaintiff New York Marine and General Insurance Company

Dated: January 26, 2022 NEMECEK & COLE, a PC

By: /s/Matthew J. Hafey (as approved 1/26/22) Matthew J. Hafey Attorneys for Defendant Kinsale Insurance Company

Dated: January 26, 2022 PLEDGER LAW, PC

By: /s/Jean M. Pledger (as approved 1/13/22) Jean M. Pledger Attorneys for Real PARTIES in Interest TRC Operating Company, Inc. and TRC Cypress Group, LLC

Pursuant to the above stipulation of the PARTIES and good cause showing, the Court adopts the stipulated protective order. The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents subject to the protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non-dispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any approved document filed under seal, the party shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to protect only the information that is confidential or was deemed confidential.

Dated: February 10, 2022 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE