St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 10, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-00967·Unknown

Opinion

1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP 2 James P. Wagoner, #58553 Kevin D. Hansen, #119831 3 Brandon M. Fish, #203880 7647 North Fresno Street 4 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 5 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300

6 Attorneys for Plaintiff New York Marine and General Insurance Company 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE Case No. 1:20-cv-00967-JLT-BAK INSURANCE COMPANY, (BAM) 12 Plaintiff, Consolidated With Case No. 1:20-cv- 13 01085-NONE-JLT KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, 14 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED Defendant. PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 Hon. Jennifer L. Thurston 16 NEW YORK MARINE AND Complaint Filed: August 5, 2020 17 GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Trial Date: None a Delaware corporation, 18 [Concurrently Filed With Stipulation To Plaintiff, Lift Stay For Limited Purpose Of 19 Obtaining A Protective Order; v. Declaration of James P. Wagoner] 20 KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, 21 an Arkansas corporation,

22 Defendant.

23 TRC OPERATING COMPANY, INC., 24 a California corporation, TRC CYPRESS GROUP, LLC, a California 25 Limited Liability Company,

26 Real PARTIES in Interest.

27 1 2 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff St. 3 Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) in case no. 1:20-cv-00967- 4 NONE-JLT, Plaintiff New York Marine and General Insurance Company (“New 5 York Marine”) in case no. 1:20-cv-01085-NONE-JLT, Defendant Kinsale Insurance 6 Company (“Kinsale”) in case nos. 1:20-cv-00967-NONE-JLT and 1:20-cv-01085- 7 NONE-JLT, and Real Parties in Interest TRC Operating Company, Inc. and TRC 8 Cypress Group, LLC (collectively referred to as the “TRC Entities”) in case no. 9 1:20-cv-01085-NONE-JLT (St. Paul, New York Marine, Kinsale and the TRC 10 Entities are collectively referred to as the “PARTIES”), through their undersigned 11 counsel, jointly submit this Stipulated Protective Order (“PROTECTIVE ORDER”) 12 to govern the handling of information and materials produced in the course of 13 discovery or filed with the Court in advance of trial in this ACTION. 14 I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 15 DISCLOSURE and discovery activity in this ACTION are likely to involve 16 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 17 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 18 prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the PARTIES to this 19 ACTION hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER. 21 The PARTIES acknowledge that this PROTECTIVE ORDER does not confer 22 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 23 protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 24 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under established 25 legal principles. The PARTIES further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, 26 below, that this PROTECTIVE ORDER does not automatically entitle them to file 27 confidential information under seal; rather Eastern District Local Rule 141 sets forth 1 PARTY seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 2 Nothing in this PROTECTIVE ORDER shall be deemed an admission by any 3 PARTY that certain categories or types of DOCUMENTS or information contain 4 proprietary or confidential information. Each PARTY retains the right to challenge 5 any and all information designated “CONFIDENTIAL,” as defined in Paragraph 3.3 6 below, through the procedures detailed in this PROTECTIVE ORDER. Nothing in 7 this PROTECTIVE ORDER shall be deemed a waiver of any such rights. 8 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED, AND JOINTLY 9 REQUESTED by and between the PARTIES to St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. 10 Kinsale Ins. Co. (Case No. 1:20-cv-00967-NONE-JLT) and New York Marine and 11 General Ins. Co. v. Kinsale Ins. Co. (Case No. 1:20-cv-01085-NONE-JLT), which 12 are consolidated as of February 2, 2021 (Dkt. No. 12), with the scheduling order 13 issued in Case No. 1:20-cv-01085 NONE JLT controlling the consolidated action, 14 by and through their respective counsel of record, that this COURT enter this 15 PROTECTIVE ORDER to govern the proceedings in this ACTION for good cause 16 shown and according to the following terms and provisions. 17 II. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO L.R. 141.1(C) 18 This ACTION is likely to involve CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary business 19 and commercial information and trade secrets of the PARTIES, as well as sensitive 20 and private information about PARTIES and NON-PARTIES for which special 21 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 22 prosecution and defense of this ACTION is warranted. Such CONFIDENTIAL and 23 proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, 24 CONFIDENTIAL business or financial information; information regarding 25 CONFIDENTIAL business practices; other CONFIDENTIAL research, 26 development, or commercial information (including information implicating privacy 27 rights of third PARTIES); information otherwise generally unavailable to the public; 1 federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. 2 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 3 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 4 protect information the PARTIES are entitled to keep CONFIDENTIAL, to ensure 5 that the PARTIES are permitted reasonably necessary use of such material in 6 preparation for and in the conduct of proceedings in this ACTION, to address their 7 handling at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective 8 order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the PARTIES 9 that information will not be designated as CONFIDENTIAL for tactical reasons and 10 that nothing be so designated without a good-faith belief that it has been maintained 11 in a CONFIDENTIAL, nonpublic manner, and there is good cause why it should not 12 be part of the public record of this case. 13 Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(1): Examples of CONFIDENTIAL 14 information that the PARTIES may seek to protect from unrestricted or unprotected 15 DISCLOSURE include: 16 a) Information that is the subject of a non-disclosure or confidentiality 17 agreement or obligation or subject to the mediation or settlement 18 privileges; 19 b) Agreements with third-parties, including liability coverage agreements, 20 reservation of rights letters, underwriting information, insurance 21 contracts and financial information (such as premium, rating 22 information, and rating basis (e.g. gross sales), which may be set forth 23 in insurance contracts); 24 c) Information related to claims administration and management, 25 including but not limited to costs, margins, or other internal 26 financial/accounting information, including non-public information 27 related to financial condition or performance and income or other non- 1 d) Information related to past, current, and future market analyses and 2 business and marketing development, including plans, strategies, 3 forecasts and competition. 4 e) All documents, materials and testimony marked confidential in the in 5 the underlying litigation TRC Operating Company, Inc. v. Chevron 6 U.S.A., Inc., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern, 7 Case No.: S-1500-CV-282520-DRL. 8 f) The TRC Entities’ trade secrets, business and financial information. 9 Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(2): Generally speaking, information and 10 DOCUMENTS shall only be designated under this PROTECTIVE ORDER because 11 the DESIGNATING PARTY believes the information or DOCUMENTS are 12 proprietary and/or CONFIDENTIAL that the DESIGNATING PARTY would not 13 release publicly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company (St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)