Spriggs v. State

392 So. 2d 9, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17628
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 19, 1980
DocketNo. 79-1027
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 392 So. 2d 9 (Spriggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spriggs v. State, 392 So. 2d 9, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinions

WESSEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge.

During the closing arguments the prosecutor picked up the knife which was admitted into evidence as used by the appellant during an armed robbery, and said to the jury, “It’s not funny ... this is a weapon.”, and proceeded to stick the knife into the jury rail.1

Appellant claims it was error for the Trial Court to allow this communication even without a motion for mistrial. It is clear that the prosecutor’s acts were designed to inflame the jury. Accordingly, we rebuke and admonish the prosecutor for his improper communication. Prejudicial comments or communications by a prosecutor in closing argument may be grounds for mistrial. Johnson v. State, 88 Fla. 461, 102 So. 549 (1924); Daugherty v. State, 154 Fla. 308, 17 So.2d 290 (1944); Glassman v. State, 377 So.2d 208, 3rd DCA (1979).

However, the Defendant’s own bizarre conduct, together with the continuous laughing and interruptions during the trial certainly provoked the prosecutor and solicited these comments. Pait v. State, 112 So.2d 380 (Fla.1959).

The evidence against the Defendant was overwhelming, and the Appellant’s failure to request the Court to rebuke the prosecutor for his misconduct during the trial, together with the overwhelming evidence forces the conclusion that the communication was harmless error. Washington v. State, 343 So.2d 908 (Fla.App.1977). Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., specially concurs. BERANEK, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ayalavillamizar v. State
134 So. 3d 492 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Nardone v. State
798 So. 2d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Robinson v. State
610 So. 2d 1288 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Brown v. State
550 So. 2d 527 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 So. 2d 9, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spriggs-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.