Brown v. State

537 So. 2d 1140, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 461, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 622, 1989 WL 10984
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 1989
DocketNo. 87-1776
StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 1140 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. State, 537 So. 2d 1140, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 461, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 622, 1989 WL 10984 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

Appellant Brown appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus (which we elect to treat as a Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief), alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Finding the motion to be legally insufficient on its face, we affirm the summary denial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 So. 2d 1140, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 461, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 622, 1989 WL 10984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.