Spriggs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Spriggs v. State

364 So. 2d 1253, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16819

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Spriggs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17628 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 1978·No. No. 77-1437·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Spriggs v. State, 364 So. 2d 1253, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16819 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

364 So. 2d 1253 (Spriggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related