Sperry Rand Corporation, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated
272 F.2d 29
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 1959
Docket29
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases
This text of 272 F.2d 29 (Sperry Rand Corporation, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sperry Rand Corporation, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated, 272 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1959).
Opinions
On motion for leave to appeal. Motion denied as untimely. See Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, 3 Cir., 260 F.2d 431.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marisol, A., by Her Next Friend, Rev. Dr. James Alexander Forbes, Jr. v. Rudolph W. Giuliani, as Mayor of the City of New York
104 F.3d 524 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Quaker State Minit-Lube, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
868 F. Supp. 1278 (D. Utah, 1994)
Al-Jundi v. Estate of Rockefeller
757 F. Supp. 206 (W.D. New York, 1990)
Miguel Antonio Aparicio v. Swan Lake, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., Third Party v. Panama Canal Company, Third Party
643 F.2d 1109 (Third Circuit, 1981)
Graves v. C & S National Bank
491 F. Supp. 280 (D. South Carolina, 1980)
Montecatini Edison, S.P.A. (A Corporation of Italy) v. Karl Ziegler, and E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company (A Corporation of Delaware)
486 F.2d 1279 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Kohn v. Royall, Koegel & Wells
59 F.R.D. 515 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Potter Instrument Co. v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.
309 F. Supp. 866 (S.D. New York, 1969)
Leighton v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad
306 F. Supp. 513 (S.D. New York, 1969)
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp.
291 F. Supp. 428 (S.D. New York, 1968)
Kraus v. Board Of County Road Commissioners For The County Of Kent
364 F.2d 919 (Sixth Circuit, 1966)
Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners
364 F.2d 919 (Sixth Circuit, 1966)
Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
234 F. Supp. 698 (District of Columbia, 1964)
Joseph Walters v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.
312 F.2d 893 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Houston Fearless Corporation v. Guy Teter, No. I.A. 25
313 F.2d 91 (Tenth Circuit, 1962)
Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.
208 F. Supp. 598 (S.D. New York, 1962)
Costas Hadjipateras, Nicholas Hadjipateras and Dimitri Dracos v. Pacifica, S. A., and George Tsakalotos
290 F.2d 697 (Fifth Circuit, 1961)
United States v. Dante Edward Gori
282 F.2d 43 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Haraburda v. United States Steel Corporation
187 F. Supp. 86 (W.D. Michigan, 1960)
Perth Amboy National Bank v. Brodsky
185 F. Supp. 219 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
272 F.2d 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sperry-rand-corporation-john-presper-eckert-jr-and-john-w-mauchly-v-ca2-1959.