Spencer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Spencer v. State

95 So. 61, 19 Ala. App. 95, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 20

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 1923

Docket4 Div. 852.

StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 61 (Spencer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spencer v. State, 95 So. 61, 19 Ala. App. 95, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 20 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

By the verdict of the jury the defendant was convicted under the first court of the indictment, which charged that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic or spirituous liquor, etc.

This appeal is upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. The questions presented by the plea in abatement, to which demurrers were sustained, and by demurrers to the indictment, have been decided adversely to the contention of the defendant in the following cases: Powell v. State (Ala.App.) 90 So. 138;¹ Jones v. State (Ala.App.) 90 So. 135;² Ewing v. State (Ala.App.) 90 So. 136;³ Ricketts v. State (Ala.App.) 90 So. 137;⁴ Layman v. State (Ala.App.)93 So. 66;⁵ Johnson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 503, 93 So. 375.

Under authority of these cases the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

¹ 18 Ala. App. 101.

² 18 Ala. App. 116.

³ 18 Ala. App. 166.

⁴ 18 Ala. App. 162.

⁵ 18 Ala. App. 441.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the verdict of the jury the defendant was convicted under the first court of the indictment, which charged that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic or spirituous liquor, etc.

This appeal is upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. The questions presented by the plea in abatement, to which demurrers were sustained, and by demurrers to the indictment, have been decided adversely to the contention of the defendant in the following cases: Powell v. State (Ala.App.) 90 So. 138;¹ Jones v. State (Ala.App.) 90 So. 135;² Ewing v. State (Ala.App.) 90 So. 136;³ Ricketts v. State (Ala.App.) 90 So. 137;⁴ Layman v. State (Ala.App.)93 So. 66;⁵ Johnson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 503, 93 So. 375.

Under authority of these cases the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

¹ 18 Ala. App. 101.

² 18 Ala. App. 116.

³ 18 Ala. App. 166.

⁴ 18 Ala. App. 162.

⁵ 18 Ala. App. 441.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 61, 19 Ala. App. 95, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-state-alactapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack