Johnson v. State
This text of 93 So. 375 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
These defendants were indicted, tried, and convicted for violating the prohibition law. The indictment contained four counts. Demurrers were sustained *Page 504 to count 2, and overruled to counts 3 and 4. No demurrer was interposed as to count 1 of the indictment. There is no bill of exceptions; the appeal being upon the record proper:
The demurrers to counts 3 and 4 of the indictment were properly overruled, under the authority of Black v. State,
The sixth ground of demurrer is not well taken, and the plea in abatement, which raises the same question, is also without merit; this express question having been so decided by this court in Powell v. State, ante, p. 101,
Affirmed.
Application overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 So. 375, 18 Ala. App. 503, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-alactapp-1922.