Johnson v. State

84 So. 359, 17 Ala. App. 335
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 20, 1920
Docket3 Div. 359.
StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 359 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. State, 84 So. 359, 17 Ala. App. 335 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty of embezzlement (misdemeanor) following a verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant in due form as required by law. The certificate of the clerk shows more than 90 days have elapsed since the judgment of conviction, and notation of appeal by defendant, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented. *Page 336

There being no bill of exceptions, this court cannot review and pass upon the charges set out in the record as refused to the defendant. We find nothing in the record authorizing a reversal of the judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 So. 359, 17 Ala. App. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-alactapp-1920.