Jones v. State

88 So. 351, 18 Ala. App. 56, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 46
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 8, 1921
Docket7 Div. 690.
StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 351 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. State, 88 So. 351, 18 Ala. App. 56, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 46 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

[1, 2] The judge trying this case had all the parties and witnesses before him, had the advantage of observing their manner on the stand, their expressions, hesitancies in testifying, if any, and all the testimony was given ore tenus. The evidence is in sharp conflict, but even with the burden resting on the state of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, when all reasonable presumptions are allowed in favor of the correctness of the judgment, we are unwilling to say that the trial court was wrong in its conclusions. ,

There was no error in the admission of testimony, and appellant’s counsel does not so contend.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 So. 351, 18 Ala. App. 56, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-alactapp-1921.