Southern Railway Co. v. Hutcheson

71 S.E. 802, 136 Ga. 591, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 152
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 13, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 71 S.E. 802 (Southern Railway Co. v. Hutcheson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Hutcheson, 71 S.E. 802, 136 Ga. 591, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 152 (Ga. 1911).

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

1. A physical injury which impairs the capacity of a married woman to labor is classified by the law with pain and suffering. Metropolitan R. Co. v. Johnson, 90 Ga. 500 (16 S. E. 49). In a suit by a married woman for a personal injury, an allegation of impaired capacity to labor resulting from the injury is not irrelevant as an element of damage.

2. Where the question under consideration is one of opinion, a non-expert witness'may state the facts and circumstances and his opinion predicated thereon.

3. In a suit against a railroad company for a personal injury caused by a horse, alleged to have been frightened by unusual and unnecessary noises made by the defendant’s locomotive, it is competent to show that the horse was roadworthy and was not. subject to fright by the ordinary and usual noises incident to the operation of locomotives and cars.

4. The charges on the subject of a railroad company’s liability for an injury to a traveler on a public thoroughfare alongside the railroad, alleged to have been caused by the traveler’s horse becoming frightened by the unusual and unnecessary noises made by the locomotive of the company in approaching the station, were in substantial accord with the rule of liability as defined in Georgia Railroad v. Carr, 73 Ga. 557.

5. The evidence authorized the verdict, and, in view of the general charge, the specific exceptions are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Hutchins
113 S.E.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad v. Hutcheson
35 S.E.2d 544 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Railway Express Agency Inc. v. Standridge
24 S.E.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Roberts v. Hardin
180 S.E. 634 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Bullard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
122 S.E. 75 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Southern Railway Co. v. Ray
118 S.E. 53 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Atkinson v. Taylor
78 S.E. 830 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 S.E. 802, 136 Ga. 591, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-hutcheson-ga-1911.