Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding
3 A.D.2d 823, 161 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5934
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 A.D.2d 430 →
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding, 3 A.D.2d 823, 161 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
3 A.D.2d 823 (Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.