Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding
2 A.D.2d 882, 157 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3861
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1956·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion to direct defendant to answer questions put to him on an examination before trial or for alternative relief, unanimously affirmed. Concur — Peek, P. J., Botein, Rabin, Cox and Valente, JJ. [208 Misc. 846.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding, 2 A.D.2d 882, 157 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).
2 A.D.2d 882 (Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flushing National Bank v. Transamerica Insurance
135 A.D.2d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
State v. Carey Resources, Inc.
97 A.D.2d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
State v. Skibinski
87 A.D.2d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)