Souliotes v. Evans

Ninth Circuit

Souliotes v. Evans

654 F.3d 902, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17034, 2011 WL 3606632

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2011·No. No. 08-15943·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

ORDER

In light of the intervening en banc decision in Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc), we vacate our opinion in Souliotes v. Evans, 622 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir.2010), reverse the district court’s dismissal of Souliotes’s habeas petition as untimely, and remand for proceedings consistent with Lee.

We also vacate our order of limited remand issued on May 25, 2011, with the understanding that the district court will conduct whatever proceedings are necessary, in an expedited manner, to determine whether any of Souliotes’s habeas claims may be addressed on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

In light of the intervening en banc decision in Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc), we vacate our opinion in Souliotes v. Evans, 622 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir.2010), reverse the district court’s dismissal of Souliotes’s habeas petition as untimely, and remand for proceedings consistent with Lee.

We also vacate our order of limited remand issued on May 25, 2011, with the understanding that the district court will conduct whatever proceedings are necessary, in an expedited manner, to determine whether any of Souliotes’s habeas claims may be addressed on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Souliotes v. Evans, 654 F.3d 902, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17034, 2011 WL 3606632 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

654 F.3d 902 (Souliotes v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related