Soro Co. International v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Soro Co. International v. Jones

89 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 385609, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1550

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2012

DocketNo. 3D11-1129

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 89 So. 3d 258 (Soro Co. International v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soro Co. International v. Jones, 89 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 385609, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1550 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

WELLS, Chief Judge.

The Soro Company International Inc. appeals an order of the appellate division of the circuit court affirming a Final Judgment for Removal of a Tenant. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certio-rari, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier cer-tiorari review, this Court must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WELLS, Chief Judge.

The Soro Company International Inc. appeals an order of the appellate division of the circuit court affirming a Final Judgment for Removal of a Tenant. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certio-rari, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier cer-tiorari review, this Court must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 385609, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soro-co-international-v-jones-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack