Soro Co. International v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Soro Co. International v. Jones

89 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 385609, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1550

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 2012·No. No. 3D11-1129·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WELLS, Chief Judge.

The Soro Company International Inc. appeals an order of the appellate division of the circuit court affirming a Final Judgment for Removal of a Tenant. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certio-rari, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier cer-tiorari review, this Court must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WELLS, Chief Judge.

The Soro Company International Inc. appeals an order of the appellate division of the circuit court affirming a Final Judgment for Removal of a Tenant. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certio-rari, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier cer-tiorari review, this Court must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Soro Co. International v. Jones, 89 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 385609, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1550 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

89 So. 3d 258 (Soro Co. International v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related