Boffelli v. Kent Security

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 22, 2015·No. 14-2897·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 22, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2897 Lower Tribunal No. 13-421 ________________

Enzio C. Boffelli, Petitioner,

vs.

Kent Security Services, Respondent.

On Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stanford Blake, Lisa S. Walsh and Marcia B. Caballero, Judges.

Enzio C. Boffelli, in proper person.

Cole, Scott & Kissane and Kathryn L. Smith, for respondent.

Before WELLS, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

WELLS, Judge. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R.App. P.

9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the

essential requirements of the law. See Soro Co. Intern., Inc. v. Jones 89 So. 3d

258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19

So. 3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court

must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded

procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boffelli v. Kent Security, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Boffelli v. Kent Security (Boffelli v. Kent Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Florida Properties, LLC
19 So. 3d 395 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Soro Co. International v. Jones
89 So. 3d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)