Boffelli v. Kent Security
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 22, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D14-2897 Lower Tribunal No. 13-421 ________________
Enzio C. Boffelli, Petitioner,
vs.
Kent Security Services, Respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stanford Blake, Lisa S. Walsh and Marcia B. Caballero, Judges.
Enzio C. Boffelli, in proper person.
Cole, Scott & Kissane and Kathryn L. Smith, for respondent.
Before WELLS, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
WELLS, Judge. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R.App. P.
9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the
essential requirements of the law. See Soro Co. Intern., Inc. v. Jones 89 So. 3d
258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19
So. 3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court
must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded
procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).
Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boffelli v. Kent Security (Boffelli v. Kent Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.