Boffelli v. Kent Security

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boffelli v. Kent Security

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 22, 2015

Docket14-2897

StatusPublished

This text of Boffelli v. Kent Security (Boffelli v. Kent Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boffelli v. Kent Security, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 22, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2897 Lower Tribunal No. 13-421 ________________

Enzio C. Boffelli, Petitioner,

vs.

Kent Security Services, Respondent.

On Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stanford Blake, Lisa S. Walsh and Marcia B. Caballero, Judges.

Enzio C. Boffelli, in proper person.

Cole, Scott & Kissane and Kathryn L. Smith, for respondent.

Before WELLS, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

WELLS, Judge. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R.App. P.

9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the

essential requirements of the law. See Soro Co. Intern., Inc. v. Jones 89 So. 3d

258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19

So. 3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court

must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded

procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI