Boffelli v. Kent Security Services

175 So. 3d 310, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046, 2015 WL 4464560
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 2015
DocketNo. 3D14-2897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 So. 3d 310 (Boffelli v. Kent Security Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boffelli v. Kent Security Services, 175 So. 3d 310, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046, 2015 WL 4464560 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Soro Co. Intern., Inc. v. Jones 89 So.3d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court must de[311]*311termine whether the circuit court, acting m its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Percival v. Capps
240 So. 3d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 So. 3d 310, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046, 2015 WL 4464560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boffelli-v-kent-security-services-fladistctapp-2015.