Boffelli v. Kent Security Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boffelli v. Kent Security Services

175 So. 3d 310, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046, 2015 WL 4464560

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 22, 2015·No. No. 3D14-2897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Soro Co. Intern., Inc. v. Jones 89 So.3d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court must de[311]*311termine whether the circuit court, acting m its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WELLS, Judge.

We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Soro Co. Intern., Inc. v. Jones 89 So.3d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court must de[311]*311termine whether the circuit court, acting m its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.

Boffelli v. Kent Security Services, 175 So. 3d 310, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046, 2015 WL 4464560 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

175 So. 3d 310 (Boffelli v. Kent Security Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related