Sola v. Clostermann
681 P.2d 178, 68 Or. App. 381, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3394
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 16, 1984
DocketA8101-00202; CA A25060
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 681 P.2d 178 (Sola v. Clostermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sola v. Clostermann, 681 P.2d 178, 68 Or. App. 381, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3394 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
Defendant Clostermann’s motion to clarify our opinion, 67 Or App 468, 679 P2d 317 (1984), is allowed. The dispositional part of the opinion, 67 Or App at 474, is amended to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendants.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harris v. Kissling
721 P.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
Jacobs v. Macmillan
719 P.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
Floyd v. Kosko
329 S.E.2d 459 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
681 P.2d 178, 68 Or. App. 381, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sola-v-clostermann-orctapp-1984.