Sola v. Clostermann
681 P.2d 178, 68 Or. App. 381, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3394
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 16, 1984·No. A8101-00202; CA A25060·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Defendant Clostermann’s motion to clarify our opinion, 67 Or App 468, 679 P2d 317 (1984), is allowed. The dispositional part of the opinion, 67 Or App at 474, is amended to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendants.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sola v. Clostermann, 681 P.2d 178, 68 Or. App. 381, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3394 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
681 P.2d 178 (Sola v. Clostermann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. Kissling
721 P.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
Jacobs v. Macmillan
719 P.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
Floyd v. Kosko
329 S.E.2d 459 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1985)