Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C.
Opinion
DISMISS; Opinion Filed March 7, 2013
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00674-CV
SOHEILA AREFKIA, Appellant V. COMPASS BANK D/B/A BBVA COMPASS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC10-10916
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Before the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Specifically, appellee
contends the appeal should be dismissed because appellant has failed to file a sufficient brief.
We hold pro se litigants to the same standards as licensed attorneys and require them to
comply with applicable laws and rules of procedure. See In the Interest of N.E.B. and R.T.B.,
251 S.W.3d 211-12 (Tex. Dallas—2008, no pet.). To do otherwise would give pro se litigants an
unfair advantage over a litigant who is represented by counsel. Id. At 212.
Appellant filed her brief on November 8, 2012. Because her brief did not comply with
the appellate briefing rules, the Court sent appellant a defective brief notice and instructed her to
file an amended brief complying with the rules within ten days and cautioned her that failure to do so may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1 &
38.8(a)(1). Appellant tendered her amended brief on December 13, 2012. Appellant’s amended
brief was not compliant and the Court again sent appellant a defective brief notice. Appellant
filed her second amended brief on January 11, 2013. Appellant’s brief fails to include, among
other things, a concise statement of facts supported by record references or a clear and concise
argument to support the contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and the record.
TEX. R. APP. P.38.1(g) & (i).
The Court has given appellant two opportunities to file a compliant brief. Appellant has
failed to do so. Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(c).
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
120674F.P05
2 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
SOHEILA AREFKIA, Appellant On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-12-00674-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC10-10916. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. COMPASS BANK D/B/A BBVA Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating. COMPASS, Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee, COMPASS BANK D/B/A BBVA COMPASS, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant, SOHEILA AREFKIA.
Judgment entered March 7, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C. (Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.