Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 17, 2012·No. 05-12-00674-CV·Published

Opinion

Order issued December /1 , 2012

In The (Court of Apprato NMI Distrirt of Irmo at Dallas No. 05-12-00674-CV

SOHEILA AREFKIA, Appellant V. RAD LAW FIRM, P.C., Appellee

ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

Before the Court is appellant' s December 11, 2012 motion for an extension of time. In her motion,

appellant informs the Court that her brief has been filed. Appellant filed a brief on November 8, 2012. On

November 13, 2012, the Court notified appellant that her brief was defective and instructed appellant to file

an amended brief that complies with rule of appellate procedure 38.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. Thus, we treat

appellant' s motion as one asking for an extension of time to file an amended brief. We GRANT appellant's

motion. Appellant shall file her amended brief on or before January 11, 2013. We caution appellant that

failure to file an amended brief on or before January 11, 2013 will result in dismissal of the appeal without

further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).

DOUGL S. LANG JUSTIC

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C. (Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.