Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C.
Opinion
Order issued December 2012
(£ourt of Appe ala fth iatrict of e.v.a at allaa No. 05-12-00674-CV
SOHEILA AREFKIA, Appellant V. RAD LAW FIRM, P.C., Appellee
ORDER
Before the Court is appellant’s December 11, 2012 motion for an extension of time. In her motion,
appellant informs the Court that her brief has been filed. Appellant filed a brief on November 8, 2012. On
November 13, 2012, the Court notified appellant that her brief was defective and instructed appellant to file
an amended brief that complies with rule of appellate procedure 38.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. Thus, we treat
appellant’s motion as one asking for an extension of time to file an amended brief. We GRANT appellant’s
motion. Appellant shall file her amended brief on or before January 11, 2012. We caution appellant that
failure to file an amended brief on or before January 11, 2012 will result in dismissal of the appeal without
further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C. (Soheila Arefkia v. Rad Law Firm, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.