Smith v. State

164 S.E. 108, 45 Ga. App. 234, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 255
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Ga. App. 419
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 30, 1932·No. 22148·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of driving an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquors. His motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. There was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of [235]*235the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Decided April 30, 1932. Carl H. Griffin, G. E. Maddox, for plaintiff in error. M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, Horace E. Shattuclc, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 164 S.E. 108, 45 Ga. App. 234, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 255 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

164 S.E. 108 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.