Smith v. State
148 S.E. 601, 39 Ga. App. 810, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 564
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Ga. App. 366 →
Opinion
1. So far as the alleged newly discovered evidence is material, it is cumulative and is impeaching in its' nature. Moreover, the State made a counter-showing; and when this is done, a reviewing court will not control the discretion of the trial judge, unless it is manifestly abused. It was not abused in this ease. Caswell v. State, 31 Ga. App. 178, 180 (120 S. E. 2d), and cit.
2. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 148 S.E. 601, 39 Ga. App. 810, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 564 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).
148 S.E. 601 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caswell v. State
120 S.E. 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)