Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

158 S.E. 433, 43 Ga. App. 222, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 268
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Ga. App. 366 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1931·No. 21299·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial is not unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge, and can not be considered by this court.

2. The verdict being supported by ample evidence and approved by the trial judge, this court will not disturb it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 158 S.E. 433, 43 Ga. App. 222, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 268 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

158 S.E. 433 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.