Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Smith v. State

222 S.W.3d 214, 364 Ark. 581

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 12, 2006

DocketCR 05-1039

StatusPublished

This text of 222 S.W.3d 214 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. State, 222 S.W.3d 214, 364 Ark. 581 (Ark. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We previously granted the Motion for Rule on Clerk and remanded the matter to the trial court to make findings of fact on the issue of attorney error. From the findings of fact presented, it is clear that the error here soundly rests on Sandra Trotter Phillips. It is the responsibility of the trial counsel to perfect the appeal. This responsibility cannot be handed off to any other. The issue of attorney error is referred to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We previously granted the Motion for Rule on Clerk and remanded the matter to the trial court to make findings of fact on the issue of attorney error. From the findings of fact presented, it is clear that the error here soundly rests on Sandra Trotter Phillips. It is the responsibility of the trial counsel to perfect the appeal. This responsibility cannot be handed off to any other. The issue of attorney error is referred to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 S.W.3d 214, 364 Ark. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-ark-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack