Smith v. Serna

367 F.2d 324
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 18, 1966·No. No. 8776·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Smith brought this civil action against several New Mexico law enforcement officials, alleging damages arising out of false arrest and imprisonment. The complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Smith thereupon appealed.

The appeal clearly must be dismissed for lack of a final judgment. It was not the action, but merely the complaint which was dismissed. In Garrison v. Lacey, 10 Cir., 362 F.2d 798, 799, this court stated:

“The hazards which beset a layman when he seeks to represent himself are illustrated by this appeal. The record contains no final judgment. The order sought to be reviewed dismissed the complaint but did not dismiss the action. Hence it is nonappealable. See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53, certiorari denied 379 U.S. 989, 85 S.Ct. 702, 13 L.Ed.2d 610. * * * ”

See, also, Martinez v. Flores, 9 Cir., 299 F.2d 888, and cases therein cited.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Serna, 367 F.2d 324 (10th Cir. 1966).

367 F.2d 324 (Smith v. Serna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related