James E. Garrison v. Alonzo L. Lacey, Special Agent, E. M. Garnett, U.S. Commissioner, and mr.baylark, U.S. Marshal

Tenth Circuit

James E. Garrison v. Alonzo L. Lacey, Special Agent, E. M. Garnett, U.S. Commissioner, and mr.baylark, U.S. Marshal

362 F.2d 798, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5741

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJune 22, 1966

Docket8620

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 362 F.2d 798 (James E. Garrison v. Alonzo L. Lacey, Special Agent, E. M. Garnett, U.S. Commissioner, and mr.baylark, U.S. Marshal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James E. Garrison v. Alonzo L. Lacey, Special Agent, E. M. Garnett, U.S. Commissioner, and mr.baylark, U.S. Marshal, 362 F.2d 798, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5741 (10th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff Garrison sued various federal officials alleging false arrest and arraignment. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss.

Garrison was charged with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312, found guilty by a jury, and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. On appeal the judgment was affirmed. See Garrison v. United States, 10 Cir., 353 F.2d 94. Circumstances related to this criminal case form the basis for the civil action with which we are now concerned. The instant action was brought while Garrison was a prisoner in a federal penitentiary. On this appeal Garrison’s appointed counsel argues only that the district court erred in appointing an attorney in this civil case as a friend of the court to review Garrison’s claims instead of appointing an attorney as an advocate. Although under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) the court may appoint an attorney for an indigent, it is not required to do so. The Constitution does not force a lawyer on a litigant. See Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279, 63 S.Ct. 236, 87 L.Ed. 268. The record shows that Garrison chose to be his own lawyer.

The hazards which beset a layman when he seeks to represent himself are illustrated by this appeal. The record contains no final judgment. The order sought to be reviewed dismissed the complaint but did not dismiss the action. Hence it is nonappealable. See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53, certiorari denied 379 U.S. 989, 85 S.Ct. 702, 13 L.Ed.2d 610.

Appeal dismissed for lack of a final judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff Garrison sued various federal officials alleging false arrest and arraignment. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss.

Garrison was charged with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312, found guilty by a jury, and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. On appeal the judgment was affirmed. See Garrison v. United States, 10 Cir., 353 F.2d 94. Circumstances related to this criminal case form the basis for the civil action with which we are now concerned. The instant action was brought while Garrison was a prisoner in a federal penitentiary. On this appeal Garrison’s appointed counsel argues only that the district court erred in appointing an attorney in this civil case as a friend of the court to review Garrison’s claims instead of appointing an attorney as an advocate. Although under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) the court may appoint an attorney for an indigent, it is not required to do so. The Constitution does not force a lawyer on a litigant. See Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279, 63 S.Ct. 236, 87 L.Ed. 268. The record shows that Garrison chose to be his own lawyer.

The hazards which beset a layman when he seeks to represent himself are illustrated by this appeal. The record contains no final judgment. The order sought to be reviewed dismissed the complaint but did not dismiss the action. Hence it is nonappealable. See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53, certiorari denied 379 U.S. 989, 85 S.Ct. 702, 13 L.Ed.2d 610.

Appeal dismissed for lack of a final judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 F.2d 798, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-e-garrison-v-alonzo-l-lacey-special-agent-e-m-garnett-us-ca10-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack