Smith v. Saul

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided November 2, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00364·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00364-GCM SANDRA KAY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s Consent Motion to Remand to the Social Security Administration (ECF No. 16). Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of Defendant’s motion, with Plaintiffs consent, to remand this case for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. See Melkonyan vy. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). On remand, Plaintiff will be given the opportunity for a new hearing. The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. Signed: November 2, 2021 Lab Leah Graham C. Mullen ee United States District Judge mga

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Saul, (W.D.N.C. 2021).

Smith v. Saul (Smith v. Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)